The other day I was at a conference in the Lit House as part of a cycle reflection on a more rational and sustainable use of English territory . The session explained the excesses land for urban development, and was presented by José María Ezquiaga and Rullán Onofre.
Ezquiaga introduced without explaining the issues globalization and deterritorialization . Explained without But the need for new urban paradigms.
To define the difference between compactness, continuity and density, explained that Barcelona is always fantastic example of compact density and continuity. But actually lost as Ezquiaga continuity: the new developments have broken the continuity.
Los Angles is continuous but low density. Centers in the U.S. but have no suburbs with what they do is try to continue, density and compactness .
Turning to the case of Madrid, the neighborhood of the Moral is a fragmentary story but continuous, which explains well the new developments in Madrid embedded itself and without any continuity with remaining and the city, adopting the Anglo sprawl on a scale never seen in GMT ana. As for the infrastructure that generates dispersion has been achieved in Madrid the standard of km of road per capita in the Netherlands, which is the highest in Europe.
Onofre exposed Rullán proposals pricipalmente carried out in the Balearic Islands to get a bio cam model leading to a more rational and sustainable use of territory, from incorporating other assessment criteria, different from economic opportunity to generate capital gains.
The
two speakers talked about the absurdity of proposing more housing than required, generating a huge debt and manufacturing infrastructure to reach areas where there are only skeletons of apartment buildings half done. If the increase in population between 1994 and 2004 was 14% and the increase in housing construction is 41% how not has not stopped this before? The two agree that now you can not develop one more piece: we must work with the already developed.
Ezquiaga concluded by proposing to link planning and society: the development plan as an expression of mutual commitment between Administrations and citizens from the perspective of sustainable development.
Ezquiaga introduced without explaining the issues globalization and deterritorialization . Explained without But the need for new urban paradigms.
To define the difference between compactness, continuity and density, explained that Barcelona is always fantastic example of compact density and continuity. But actually lost as Ezquiaga continuity: the new developments have broken the continuity.
Los Angles is continuous but low density. Centers in the U.S. but have no suburbs with what they do is try to continue, density and compactness .
Turning to the case of Madrid, the neighborhood of the Moral is a fragmentary story but continuous, which explains well the new developments in Madrid embedded itself and without any continuity with remaining and the city, adopting the Anglo sprawl on a scale never seen in GMT ana. As for the infrastructure that generates dispersion has been achieved in Madrid the standard of km of road per capita in the Netherlands, which is the highest in Europe.
Onofre exposed Rullán proposals pricipalmente carried out in the Balearic Islands to get a bio cam model leading to a more rational and sustainable use of territory, from incorporating other assessment criteria, different from economic opportunity to generate capital gains.
The
two speakers talked about the absurdity of proposing more housing than required, generating a huge debt and manufacturing infrastructure to reach areas where there are only skeletons of apartment buildings half done. If the increase in population between 1994 and 2004 was 14% and the increase in housing construction is 41% how not has not stopped this before? The two agree that now you can not develop one more piece: we must work with the already developed.
Ezquiaga concluded by proposing to link planning and society: the development plan as an expression of mutual commitment between Administrations and citizens from the perspective of sustainable development.
0 comments:
Post a Comment